Olive Branch Optimism
what a wonderful world...
Thursday, November 17, 2005
John Edwards - FOR US PRESIDENT!!!!
I whole heartedly support John Edwards as the next President of the USA.

If John Edwards is elected, I will personally travel to the White House to congratulate him!

This is a letter that has been floating around written by John Edwards, and it is what we the world wants from a US leader. This man is what the international community would accept. Indeed I would even support him, and I am not a fan of US and its capitalist/imperialist leaders of late.

I hereby propose that bloggers should push for John Edwards to run for President in the next US election after Bush is impeached.

Here is the letter, I hope it does for you what it did for me.

(please leave comments!!!)

Dear Friend,

I was wrong.

I wrote these words about my vote to authorize the Iraq war in a Washington Post op-ed piece and I want to share my views with you as well.

Almost three years ago, we went into Iraq to remove what we were told -- and many of us believed and argued -- was a threat to America. But in fact we now know that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction when our forces invaded Iraq in 2003. The intelligence was deeply flawed and, in some cases, manipulated to fit a political agenda.

It was a mistake to vote for this war in 2002. I take responsibility for that mistake. It has been hard to say these words because those who didn't make a mistake -- the men and women of our armed forces and their families -- have performed heroically and paid a very dear price. It is not right, just or fair that we made a mistake, but they pay for that mistake.

The world desperately needs moral leadership from America, and the foundation for moral leadership is telling the truth.

While we can't change the past, we need to accept responsibility because a key part of restoring America's moral leadership is acknowledging when we've made mistakes or been proven wrong -- and to show that we have the creativity and guts to make it right.

The argument for going to war with Iraq was based on intelligence that we now know was inaccurate. The information the American people were hearing from the President -- and that I was being told by our intelligence community -- wasn't the whole story. Had I known this at the time, I never would have voted for this war.

George Bush won't accept responsibility for his mistakes. Along with Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, he has made horrible mistakes at almost every step: twisting intelligence to fit their pre-conceived views about Iraq's threat; failed diplomacy; not going in with enough troops; not giving our forces the equipment they need; not having a plan for peace.

Because of these failures, Iraq is a mess and has become a far greater threat than it actually ever was. It is now a haven for terrorists, and our presence there is draining the goodwill that our country once enjoyed, diminishing our global standing. It has made fighting the global war against terrorist organizations more difficult, not less.

The urgent question isn't how we got here, but what we do now. We have to give our troops a way to end their mission honorably. That means leaving behind a success, not a failure.

What is success? I don't think it is Iraq as a Jeffersonian democracy. I think it is an Iraq that is relatively stable, largely self-sufficient, comparatively open and free, and in control of its own destiny.

A plan for success needs to focus on three interlocking objectives: reducing American presence; building Iraq's capacity; and getting other countries to meet their responsibilities to help.

First, we need to remove the image of the imperialist America from the landscape of Iraq. American contractors who have taken unfair advantage of the turmoil in Iraq need to leave Iraq. If that means Halliburton subsidiary, KBR, then KBR should go. Such departures, and the return of the work to Iraqi businesses, would be a real statement about our hopes for the new nation.

We also need to show Iraq and the world that we will not stay there forever. We've reached the point where the large number of our troops in Iraq hurts, not helps, our goals. Therefore, early next year, after the Iraqi elections and a new government has been created, we should begin the redeployment of a significant number of troops out of Iraq. This should be the beginning of a gradual process to reduce our presence and change the shape of our military's deployment in Iraq.

Most of these troops should come from National Guard or Reserve forces. That will still leave us with enough military capability, combined with better trained Iraqis, to fight terrorists and continue to help the Iraqis develop a stable country.

Second, this redeployment should work in concert with a more effective training program for Iraqi forces. We should implement a clear plan for training and hard deadlines for certain benchmarks to be met. To increase incentives, we should implement a schedule outlining that as we certify that Iraqi troops are trained and equipped, a proportional number of U.S. troops will withdraw.

Third, we must launch a serious diplomatic process that brings the world into this effort. We should bring Iraq's neighbors and our key European allies into a diplomatic process to get Iraq on its feet. It's not just in America's security interest for Iraq to succeed, but the world's -- and the President needs to create a unified international front.

Too many mistakes have already been made to make this easy. Yet we must take these steps to succeed. The American people, the Iraqi people and -- most importantly -- our troops who have died or been injured there and those who are fighting there today deserve nothing less.

America's leaders -- all of us -- need to accept the responsibility we each carry for how we got to this place. Over 2,000 Americans have lost their lives in this war; and over 150,000 are fighting there today. They and their families deserve honesty from our country's leaders. And they also deserve a clear plan for a way out.

Blogger A.C. said...
Hey there down under. I'd like to comment on Mr. Edwards' letter.

He says the right things. I hardly think they would all work, and others are already in place. For instance, he says we should remove the image of imperialist America. Why is KBR any different than the corruption Saddam had with the Oil For Food debacle? KBR should stay if they are able to do the job--they need to HIRE MORE IRAQIS. That would help. As to his contention that we should show the Iraqis we won't stay forever, well ask the people in Germany and Japan how long American forces remained after deposing dictators.

There cannot be any posted schedule for redeployments-period. We cannot let Zarqawi and his minions celebrate by killing more troops every time a regiment leaves. That will happen.
I do agree when our troops leave it should be Guard and Reserve first, but the DoD already knows this.

On the diplomatic side, he's living in fantasy land. Many countries in the region cannot be trusted to watch someone's cat, much less with good-faith contributions towards "cleaning up our mess". These guys had the same theme in the campaign. It wasn't viable then. Rice and Hughes have been pounding the pavement over there for a year now anyway. We ARE trying.

And lastly, Edwards and the others are totally off their rockers to say the intelligence was fixed. Edwards was on the Senate Intel Cmte, he knows better.


Links to this post:
Create a Link